Evaluation of two rapid antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital setting
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Medical Microbiology and Immunology
- Vol. 210 (1), 65-72
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-020-00698-8
Abstract
Successful containment strategies for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will depend on reliable diagnostic assays. Point-of-care antigen tests (POCT) may provide an alternative to time-consuming PCR tests to rapidly screen for acute infections on site. Here, we evaluated two SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests: the STANDARD™ F COVID-19 Ag FIA (FIA) and the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (RAT). For diagnostic assessment, we used a large set of PCR-positive and PCR-negative respiratory swabs from asymptomatic and symptomatic patients and health care workers in the setting of two University Hospitals in Munich, Germany, i.e. emergency rooms, patient care units or employee test centers. For FIA, overall clinical sensitivity and specificity were 45.4% (n = 381) and 97.8% (n = 360), respectively, and for RAT, 50.3% (n = 445) and 97.7% (n = 386), respectively. For primary diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals, diagnostic sensitivities were 60.9% (FIA) (n = 189) and 64.5% (RAT) (n = 256). This questions these tests’ utility for the reliable detection of acute SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, in particular in high-risk settings. We support the proposal that convincing high-quality outcome data on the impact of false-negative and false-positive antigen test results need to be obtained in a POCT setting. Moreover, the efficacy of alternative testing strategies to complement PCR assays must be evaluated by independent laboratories, prior to widespread implementation in national and international test strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KX2021)
- Projekt DEAL
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can We Test Our Way Out of the COVID-19 Pandemic?Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Preanalytical issues affecting the diagnosis of COVID-19Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2020
- Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020
- Multicentre comparison of quantitative PCR-based assays to detect SARS-CoV-2, Germany, March 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- A super-spreader of COVID-19 in Ningbo city in ChinaJournal of Infection and Public Health, 2020
- Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19Journal of Clinical Virology, 2020
- Rapid establishment of laboratory diagnostics for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in Bavaria, Germany, February 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCREurosurveillance, 2020
- Rapid Antigen Tests for Influenza: Rationale and Significance of the FDA ReclassificationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2018