The validity of a sore throat score in family practice.
- 3 October 2000
- journal article
- Vol. 163 (7), 811-5
Abstract
Reducing the number of antibiotic prescriptions given for common respiratory infections has been recommended as a way to limit bacterial resistance. This study assessed the validity of a previously published clinical score for the management of infections of the upper respiratory tract accompanied by sore throat. The study also examined the potential impact of this clinical score on the prescribing of antibiotics in community-based family practice. A total of 97 family physicians in 49 Ontario communities assessed 621 children and adults with a new infection of the upper respiratory tract accompanied by sore throat and recorded their prescribing decisions. A throat swab was obtained for culture. The sensitivity and specificity of the score approach in this population were compared with previously published results for patients seen at an academic family medicine centre. In addition, physicians' prescribing practices and their recommendations for obtaining throat swabs were compared with score-based recommendations. Of the 621 cases of new upper respiratory tract infection and sore throat, information about prescriptions given was available for only 619; physicians prescribed antibiotics in 173 (27.9%) of these cases. Of the 173 prescriptions, 109 (63.0%) were given to patients with culture-negative results for group A Streptococcus. Using the score to determine management would have reduced prescriptions to culture-negative patients by 63.7% and overall antibiotic prescriptions by 52.3% (both p < 0.01). Culturing of throat samples would have been reduced by 35.8% (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity or specificity of the score approach between this community-based population (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 92.1%) and an academic family medicine centre (sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 94.3%). An explicit clinical score approach to the management of patients presenting with an upper respiratory tract infection and sore throat is valid in community-based family practice and could substantially reduce the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics for these conditions.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding articles describing clinical prediction toolsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Streptococcal diagnostic testing and antibiotics prescribed for pediatric tonsillopharyngitisThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1996
- The Effect of Disease-prevalence Adjustments on the Accuracy of a Logistic Prediction ModelMedical Decision Making, 1996
- Persistence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United StatesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Nationwide survey of Kawasaki disease and acute rheumatic feverThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Comprehensive Review of Morbidity and Mortality Trends for Rheumatic Fever, Streptococcal Disease, and Scarlet Fever: The Decline of Rheumatic FeverClinical Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Penicillin and the Marked Decrease in Morbidity and Mortality from Rheumatic Fever in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Clinical Prediction RulesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Diagnosis of Strep Throat in Adults in the Emergency RoomMedical Decision Making, 1981
- Streptococcal Pharyngitis in the General Population. II. The Attack Rate of Rheumatic Fever and Acute Glomerulonephritis in Patients Not Treated with PenicillinThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1971