Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Diagnostic and Fat-Grading Accuracy of Low-Flip-Angle Multiecho Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging at 1.5 T
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 251 (1), 67-76
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080666
Abstract
To assess the accuracy of four fat quantification methods at low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by using MR spectroscopy as the reference standard. In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 110 subjects (29 with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD, 50 overweight and at risk for NAFLD, and 31 healthy volunteers) (mean age, 32.6 years +/- 15.6 [standard deviation]; range, 8-66 years) gave informed consent and underwent MR spectroscopy and GRE MR imaging of the liver. Spectroscopy involved a long repetition time (to suppress T1 effects) and multiple echo times (to estimate T2 effects); the reference fat fraction (FF) was calculated from T2-corrected fat and water spectral peak areas. Imaging involved a low flip angle (to suppress T1 effects) and multiple echo times (to estimate T2* effects); imaging FF was calculated by using four analysis methods of progressive complexity: dual echo, triple echo, multiecho, and multiinterference. All methods except dual echo corrected for T2* effects. The multiinterference method corrected for multiple spectral interference effects of fat. For each method, the accuracy for diagnosis of fatty liver, as defined with a spectroscopic threshold, was assessed by estimating sensitivity and specificity; fat-grading accuracy was assessed by comparing imaging and spectroscopic FF values by using linear regression. Dual-echo, triple-echo, multiecho, and multiinterference methods had a sensitivity of 0.817, 0.967, 0.950, and 0.983 and a specificity of 1.000, 0.880, 1.000, and 0.880, respectively. On the basis of regression slope and intercept, the multiinterference (slope, 0.98; intercept, 0.91%) method had high fat-grading accuracy without statistically significant error (P > .05). Dual-echo (slope, 0.98; intercept, -2.90%), triple-echo (slope, 0.94; intercept, 1.42%), and multiecho (slope, 0.85; intercept, -0.15%) methods had statistically significant error (P < .05). Relaxation- and interference-corrected fat quantification at low-flip-angle multiecho GRE MR imaging provides high diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy in NAFLD.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of intravenous gadolinium administration and flip angle on the assessment of liver fat signal fraction with opposed‐phase and in‐phase imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single‐voxel proton spectroscopy, two‐point dixon and three‐point IDEALMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008
- Comparison of fat quantification methods: A phantom study at 3.0TJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Hepatic lipid accumulation in healthy subjects: A comparative study using spectral fat‐selective MRI and volume‐localized 1H‐MR spectroscopyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006
- Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Steatosis to CirrhosisHepatology, 2006
- Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL): Application with fast spin‐echo imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005
- Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseHepatology, 2005
- Diagnosis of fatty liver diseaseEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2003
- Better Bootstrap Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987