An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 364 (9432), 429-437
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16766-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Innovation in healthcare: how does credible evidence influence professionals?Health & Social Care in the Community, 2003
- Systematic review of mental health interventions for patients with common somatic symptoms: can research evidence from secondary care be extrapolated to primary care?BMJ, 2002
- Effect of Specialty and Nationality on Panel Judgments of the Appropriateness of Coronary RevascularizationMedical Care, 2001
- Extracts from "Clinical Evidence": Chronic fatigue syndromeBMJ, 2000
- The Effect of Panel Membership and Feedback on Ratings in a Two-Round Delphi SurveyMedical Care, 1999
- Physician recommendations for coronary revascularization. Variations by clinical specialityEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Rating the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography — Do Practicing Physicians Agree with an Expert Panel and with Each Other?New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Behavioural rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: Comparison of an operant treatment, an operant‐cognitive treatment and an operant‐respondent treatmentBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1995
- Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel.BMJ, 1978
- A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program PlanningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971