Advance care planning in primary care
- 26 October 2006
- Vol. 333 (7574), 868-869
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39009.569861.80
Abstract
O f the various trajectories of physical decline, organ failure is often the most difficult to plan for in advance because of its unpredictability.1 The qualitative study by Davison and Simpson in this week's BMJ challenges the notion that early discussion of planning for the end of life will destroy hope rather than create it. Rather, it allowed patients dying of end stage renal failure and their carers to reflect on and reorient their aspirations.2 A wealth of evidence indicates that many elderly patients want to discuss these issues with their healthcare professionals, but this rarely happens even when (as in the United Kingdom) continuity of care with a trusted general practitioner is available.34 The main barrier is probably doctors' reluctance to raise the issue of planning for death because of the largely unfounded fear of destroying hope. Advance care planning is practised in Australia, Canada, and the United States.5–7 It is also proposed …This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hope and advance care planning in patients with end stage renal disease: qualitative interview studyBMJ, 2006
- Development of a peer education programme for advance end-of-life care planningInternational Journal of Palliative Nursing, 2006
- Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- Illness trajectories and palliative careBMJ, 2005
- Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1984