Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study shows that elderly patients may benefit from lower postoperative complication rates following laparoscopic versus open resection
Open Access
- 24 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 97 (1), 86-91
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6785
Abstract
Background: A retrospective analysis of age‐related postoperative morbidity in the Australia and New Zealand prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for right‐ and left‐sided colonic cancer is presented. Methods: A total of 592 eligible patients were entered and studied from 1998 to 2005. Results: Data from 294 patients who underwent laparoscopic and 298 who had open colonic resection were analysed; 266 patients were aged less than 70 years and 326 were 70 years or older (mean(s.d.) 70·3(11·0) years). Forty‐three laparoscopic operations (14·6 per cent) were converted to an open procedure. Fewer complications were reported for intention‐to‐treat laparoscopic resections compared with open procedures (P = 0·002), owing primarily to a lower rate in patients aged 70 years or more (P = 0·002). Fewer patients in the laparoscopic group experienced any complication (P = 0·035), especially patients aged 70 years or above (P = 0·019). Conclusion: Treatment choices for colonic cancer depend principally upon disease‐free survival; however, patients aged 70 years or over should have rigorous preoperative investigation to avoid conversion and should be considered for laparoscopic colonic resection. Registration number: NCT00202111 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Funding Information
- Robert McLelland Trust
- Trust Bank Canterbury
- J. R. Mackenzie Trust
- Johnson & Johnson Medical New Zealand
- Johnson & Johnson Medical
- The Canterbury Medical Research Foundation
- the Health Research Council of New Zealand (97/154, 04/102)
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (04/102)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- META‐ANALYSIS OF NON‐RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE SHORT‐TERM OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL CANCERAnz Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Laparoscopic Approach to Colonic Cancer: Critical Appraisal of the LiteratureDigestive Diseases, 2007
- Minimally Invasive Colorectal Resection Outcomes: Short-term Comparison with Open ProceduresJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Systematic review on the short‐term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancerColorectal Disease, 2006
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resectionPublished by Wiley ,2001