Competing Environmental Management Standards: How ISO 14001 Outnumbered EMAS in Germany, the UK, France, and Sweden
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 25 (4), 611-627
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c0602j
Abstract
In the middle of the 1990s two international environmental management standards became available for European companies: the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) and the International Organization for Standardization's ISO 14001. Companies that wanted to implement a standardized environmental management system were confronted with the choice between their national standard, the European standard, or the international one. In the past decennium, the national standards have been abolished and the number of ISO 14001 certified companies has outnumbered the number of EMAS-registered organizations. The speed at which and the extent to which ISO 14001 has outnumbered EMAS differs, however, between countries in the EU-15. We argue that a country classification based on the degree of statism of the collective agency on the one hand, and the degree of corporatism of society's organization on the other, offers a valuable perspective for analyzing the evolution of the uptake of both standards in a country. We present the cases of Germany, the UK, France, and Sweden, and conclude that in countries characterized by a more societal organization of authority, private alternatives for national regulations like ISO 14001 are welcomed and adopted with enthusiasm. In countries characterized by a rather statist organization, such alternatives are looked upon with more suspicion resulting in delayed uptake. Whereas ISO 14001 is a purely private initiative, voluntary registration to the EMAS regulation creates a link between the company and the authorities. In contrast to corporatist settings, this frightens off business participation in associational countries.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response to “Revisiting ISO 14000 Diffusion: A New ”Look“ at the Drivers of Certification”Production and Operations Management, 2004
- Companies' participation in EMAS: The influence of the public regulatorBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2002
- Member State Responses to EuropeanizationJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2002
- The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspectivePolicy Sciences, 2002
- National adaptation to European integration: institutional vetoes and goodness-of-fitJournal of European Public Policy, 2002
- The need for adaptability in EU environmental policy design and implementationEuropean Environment, 2001
- INTERNATIONAL DIFFUSION OF ISO 14000 CERTIFICATIONProduction and Operations Management, 2001
- European Union Environmental Policy and the UK Government: A Passive Observer or a Strategic Manager?Environmental Politics, 2001
- Why there is no 'southern problem'. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European UnionJournal of European Public Policy, 2000
- IS ISO 14000 WORTH IT?Journal of Business Strategy, 1996