Status-Aspirational Pricing
- 29 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administrative Science Quarterly
- Vol. 61 (2), 217-253
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216629671
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of status loss on organizations’ price-setting behavior. We predict, counter to current status theory and aligned with performance feedback theory, that a status decline prompts certain organizations to charge higher prices and that there are two kinds of organizations most prone to make such price increases: those with broad appeal across disconnected types of customers and those whose most strategically similar rivals have charged high prices previously. Using panel data from U.S. News & World Report’s annual rankings of private colleges and universities from 2005 to 2012, we model the effect of drops in rank that take a school below an aspiration level. We find that schools set tuition higher after a sharp decline in rank, particularly those that appeal widely to college applicants and whose rivals are relatively more expensive. This study presents a dynamic conception of status that differs from the prevailing view of status as a stable asset that yields concrete benefits. In contrast to past work that has assumed that organizations passively experience negative effects when their status falls, our results show that organizations actively respond to status loss. Status is a performance-related goal for such producers, who may increase prices as they work to recover lost ground after a status decline.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model of Robust Positions in Social NetworksAmerican Journal of Sociology, 2010
- The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational ChangeAmerican Sociological Review, 2009
- Research Specialization and Collaboration Patterns in SociologySocial Studies of Science, 2008
- Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative NetworksAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2008
- Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantnessProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing IndustryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 2000
- 1. The Niche Hiker's Guide to Population Ecology: A Logical Reconstruction of Organization Ecology's Niche TheorySociological Methodology, 1997
- The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision makingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970