Attitudes of physicians regarding anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review
Open Access
- 5 August 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Age and Ageing
- Vol. 40 (6), 675-683
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr097
Abstract
Background: the efficacy of warfarin for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established, but many people with AF who would benefit from warfarin are not receiving it. This systematic review aims to determine physicians' attitudes to the prescription of warfarin for AF, and identify reasons for its underuse. Methods: an electronic search of MEDLINE (1950–present), EMBASE (1980–present), CINAHL (1994–present), PsycINFO (1987–present) and Web of Knowledge (1970–present) was performed in November 2010 to identify all studies which addressed, via survey, physicians' attitudes regarding anticoagulation for patients with AF. Results: a total of 1,375 citations were identified. Of these citations, 44 full text studies were obtained for scrutinisation; 14 of these studies were rejected leaving 30 studies which were included in the review. All included studies were cross-sectional surveys and addressed physicians' opinions of anticoagulation in AF as a primary or secondary aim. Increasing age, increased bleeding risk, previous bleeds, falls risk, co-morbidities and ability to comply with treatment influenced whether physicians would prescribe anticoagulation for AF. Conclusion: physicians are reticent to recommend warfarin for elderly patients in AF, despite evidence of increased benefit in these patients compared with younger patients. Risk of falls and previous bleeding were also shown to be disproportionate barriers to warfarin prescription. Further studies are required to determine how best to overcome these perceived barriers to appropriate anticoagulation.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Australian general practice: bridging the evidence-practice gap. A national, representative postal surveyBMC Family Practice, 2008
- Anticoagulant usage for primary stroke prevention: A general practitioner survey in local areas of metropolitan SydneyJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2008
- Barriers to the Use of Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial FibrillationStroke, 2008
- 'Rules of thumb' or reflective practice? Understanding senior physicians' decision-making about anti-thrombotic usage in atrial fibrillationQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2007
- To Anticoagulate or not to Anticoagulate? A Common Dilemma for the Provider: Physicians’ Opinion Poll Based on a Case Study of an Older Long-term Care Facility Resident With Dementia and Atrial FibrillationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2006
- Stroke prevention and atrial fibrillation: reasons leading to an inappropriate management. Main results of the SAFE II studyBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Doctors’ beliefs on the use of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: identifying barriers to stroke preventionInternal Medicine Journal, 2002
- Management of atrial fibrillation: discrepancy between guideline recommendations and actual practice exposes patients to risk for complicationsEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- The effect of age and quality of life on doctors' decisions to anticoagulate patients with atrial fibrillationAge and Ageing, 1998
- Physician variation in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation.Heart, 1996