Comparison and Usefulness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography in Infants Six Months of Age or Younger With Aortic Arch Anomalies Without Deep Sedation or Anesthesia
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 108 (1), 120-125
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deep Sedation for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comparison with Cardiac AnesthesiaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2008
- Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: A validation study compared with magnetic resonance imagingJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2005
- Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional EchocardiographyCirculation, 2004
- Vascular Rings and Their Effect on Tracheal GeometryPediatric Cardiology, 2003
- Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinationsThe British Journal of Radiology, 2002
- Sedation Procedures in MR Imaging: Safety, Effectiveness, and Nursing Effect on ExaminationsRadiology, 2000
- Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomesBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000
- Thoracic MR aortography: imaging techniques and strategies.RadioGraphics, 1998
- Sedation for Pediatric Patients Undergoing CT and MRIJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1992
- Sedation in children scanned with high-field magnetic resonance; the experience at The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond StreetThe British Journal of Radiology, 1990