comparison between three rapid methods for direct diagnosis of influenza and the conventional isolation procedure
- 31 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Biologicals
- Vol. 19 (4), 287-292
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1045-1056(05)80017-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid diagnosis of influenza infection of NP antigen using an immunocapture ELISA testJournal of Virological Methods, 1989
- Rapid 24-well plate centrifugation assay for detection of influenza A virus in clinical specimensJournal of Virological Methods, 1989
- Resistance of Influenza A Virus to Amantadine and Rimantadine: Results of One Decade of SurveillanceThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- One-incubation time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay based on monoclonal antibodies in detection of influenza A and B viruses directly in clinicalJournal of Virological Methods, 1989
- Enzyme‐Linked immunosorbent assay of core antigens for clinical diagnosis of influenzaJournal of Medical Virology, 1988
- Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus by tissue culture, centrifugation, and immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody to an early nuclear antigenJournal of Virological Methods, 1987
- A comparison of acetaminophen and rimantadine in the treatment of influenza A infection in childrenJournal of Medical Virology, 1987