Tumor Enucleation vs Sharp Excision in Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: Technical Benefit Without Impact on Functional or Oncologic Outcomes
- 1 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 83 (6), 1294-1299
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment Management of Small Renal Masses in the 21st Century: A Paradigm ShiftAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Simple Enucleation Versus Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of pT1a and pT1b Renal Cell CarcinomaAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2011
- Tumor enucleation: a safe treatment alternative for renal cell carcinomaExpert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2011
- Is Simple Enucleation a Minimal Partial Nephrectomy Responding to the EAU Guidelines’ Recommendations?European Urology, 2009
- Contemporary Epidemiology of Renal Cell CancerThe Cancer Journal, 2008
- Enucleation of renal cell carcinoma with ablation of the tumour baseBJU International, 2008
- Laparoscopic versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: Analysis of the Current LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2008
- Long-term results of simple enucleation for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma.International braz j urol, 2006
- Matched Comparison of Radical Nephrectomy vs Nephron-Sparing Surgery in Patients With Unilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma and a Normal Contralateral KidneyMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000
- A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction EquationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999