Oversight of direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies
- 18 January 2019
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 363 (6424), 234-235
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0223
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mind-Reading or Misleading? Assessing Direct-to-Consumer Electroencephalography (EEG) Devices Marketed for Wellness and Their Ethical and Regulatory ImplicationsJournal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2018
- A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluation and Informed Decision Making Regarding Smartphone Apps for Clinical CarePsychiatric Services, 2018
- Dietary Supplements: Regulatory Challenges and Research ResourcesNutrients, 2018
- Who Uses Direct-to-Consumer Brain Stimulation Products, and Why? A Study of Home Users of tDCS DevicesJournal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2017
- The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo.American Psychologist, 2017
- 2017 AARP Cognitive Activity and Brain Health SurveyPublished by AARP ,2017
- Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2016
- An open letter concerning do‐it‐yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulationAnnals of Neurology, 2016
- The digital placebo effect: mobile mental health meets clinical psychiatryThe Lancet Psychiatry, 2016
- Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)Brain Stimulation, 2015