Robotic surgery: revisiting "no innovation without evaluation"
- 11 March 2013
- Vol. 346 (mar11 2), f1573
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1573
Abstract
National registries must be created so that this technology can be properly evaluated Far from being restricted to the realm of science fiction, robots are now used in many spheres—creating cars, taking inventories, and even cleaning homes (www.irobot.com).1 2 Robots have also become part of healthcare, particularly surgical procedures. Recent articles such as that in the New York Times , “When Robotic Surgery Leaves Just a Scratch,” reinforce this image.3 But what is the evidence to support the use of robotic technology in surgery? The safety and effectiveness of surgical devices and corresponding outcomes after surgery have consistently come under scrutiny in the past two decades. Despite concerns over safety, effectiveness, and sometimes costs, new devices and technologies for surgery are constantly and uncontrollably developed. These new technologies are often rapidly adopted with minimal scientific evidence.4 The da Vinci robotic system made by Intuitive Surgical was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2000 under its much criticized 510(k) device provisions with minimal clinical evidence of safety or effectiveness. The FDA has recognized the need for reform of device regulation and recently announced its new postmarket surveillance vision.5 6 The FDA’s strategy provides a clear but high level view on how to identify problems with devices in the “real world.” The proposal relies on physicians, hospitals, patients, and device manufacturers …This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic DiseaseJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2013
- Outcomes and Cost Comparisons After Introducing a Robotics Program for Endometrial Cancer SurgeryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery – a systematic reviewBJU International, 2012
- Metal-on-metal failures—in science, regulation, and policyThe Lancet, 2012
- Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical ProstatectomyJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2009
- Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 3 No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsLancet, 2009
- Cost Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy Approaches to Pulmonary LobectomyThoracic Surgery Clinics, 2008
- Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in MarylandThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1994