Cost‐effective alternatives for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in drinking water and enhancing ecosystem services
- 27 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 45 (8)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007606
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive management for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in source water: A case study in an agricultural catchment in South AustraliaJournal of Environmental Management, 2009
- Designing, testing and implementing a trial dryland salinity credit trade schemeEcological Economics, 2008
- Adoption of Stream Fencing Among Dairy Farmers in Four New Zealand CatchmentsEnvironmental Management, 2007
- Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non-market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework DirectiveJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2006
- Phosphorus, Sediment, and Escherichia coli Loads in Unfenced Streams of the Georgia Piedmont, USAJournal of Environmental Quality, 2005
- Drinking water treatment processes for removal of Cryptosporidium and GiardiaVeterinary Parasitology, 2004
- Grass Barrier and Vegetative Filter Strip Effectiveness in Reducing Runoff, Sediment, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus LossSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2004
- Fate and transport of pathogens in lakes and reservoirsEnvironment International, 2004
- Costs of Illness in the 1993 WaterborneCryptosporidiumOutbreak, Milwaukee, WisconsinEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Economic returns from the biosphereNature, 1998