Physiological changes in fowl and turkey spermatozoa duringin vitrostorage

Abstract

1. Although early work on semen storage has been rather empirical in approach, only basic research can provide a framework of biological mechanisms from which improvements in the techniques of cryopreservation and liquid semen storage can progress logically. 2. A major drawback in this work has been the lack of adequate tests for quantitating and differentiating aspects of ‘fertility’. 3. Basic research has now provided techniques for assessing: sperm fertilising ability in terms of numbers of fertile eggs; the efficiency of hens’ oviducts at accepting and retaining spermatozoa, and sperm ‘quality’ as motility, metabolism and plasma membrane patency. 4. These techniques may be used for a more critical assessment of the effects of both cryopreservation and liquid semen storage on sperm function, although the integrity of sperm surface proteins may be a more sensitive variable which has yet to be measured. 5. Further improvements in sperm cryopreservation technology are best approached through an understanding of the fundamental cellular and molecular changes which take place during freezing; thus far little is known of such changes in avian spermatozoa. 6. The ideal milieu for maintaining spermatozoa in liquid semen storage should mimic the environment of the oviducal sperm storage tubules; elucidation of the factors involved in progressing steadily.