Do Investors Mistake a Good Company for a Good Investment?
Preprint
- 1 August 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Do investors confuse the quality of a firm with its attractiveness as an investment? If so, shares of well-run companies will be bid up too high and subsequently earn negative abnormal returns. Our analysis of Fortune magazine's annual survey of "America's Most Admired Companies" for 1983-96 finds the opposite. A portfolio of the most admired decile of firms earns an abnormal return of 3.2 percent in the year after the survey is published and 8.3 percent over three years. The least admired decile of firms earns a negative abnormal return of 8.6 percent in the nine months through the end of the year, more than half of which is reversed in the first quarter of the following year. The magnitude of these abnormal returns and their persistence over five years suggest that well admired firms are not overpriced. The timing of returns to least admired firms provides evidence of window dressing.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral FinanceSSRN Electronic Journal, 1997
- Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund IndustryThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Excellence RevisitedCFA Magazine, 1994
- Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market EfficiencyThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- The Cross-Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Measuring abnormal performanceJournal of Financial Economics, 1992
- Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1990
- Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- Further Evidence On Investor Overreaction and Stock Market SeasonalityThe Journal of Finance, 1987
- Does the Stock Market Overreact?The Journal of Finance, 1985