A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits
Open Access
- 11 February 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 10, 205
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Abstract
In the last decade, the number of investigations of the beliefs in conspiracy theories has begun to increase in the fields of social, differential, and experimental psychology. A considerable number of variables have been suggested as predictors of conspiracy beliefs, amongst them personality factors such as low agreeableness (as disagreeableness is associated with suspicion and antagonism) and high openness to experience (due to its positive association to seek out unusual and novel ideas). The association between agreeableness, openness to experience and conspiracy beliefs remains unclear in the literature. The present study reviews the literature of psychological studies investigating conspiracy beliefs. Additionally, the association between Big Five personality factors and conspiracy beliefs is analyzed meta-analytically using random-effects models. Ninety-six studies were identified for the systematic review. A comprehensive account of predictors, consequences, operationalization, questionnaires, and most prominent conspiracy theories is presented. For meta-analysis, 74 effect sizes from 13 studies were extracted. The psychological literature on predictors of conspiracy beliefs can be divided in approaches either with a pathological (e.g., paranoia) or socio-political focus (e.g., perceived powerlessness). Generally, there is a lack of theoretical frameworks in this young area of research. Meta-analysis revealed that agreeableness, openness to experience, and the remaining Big Five personality factors were not significantly associated with conspiracy beliefs if effect sizes are aggregated. Considerable heterogeneity in designs and operationalization characterizes the field. This article provides an overview of instrumentation, study designs, and current state of knowledge in an effort towards advancement and consensus in the study of conspiracy beliefs.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of SciencePLOS ONE, 2013
- Commercial conspiracy theories: a pilot studyFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality QuestionnaireFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Girl in the cellar: a repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha KampuschFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs ScaleFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Dead and AliveSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2012
- Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in MalaysiaFrontiers in Psychology, 2012
- The Hidden Impact of Conspiracy Theories: Perceived and Actual Influence of Theories Surrounding the Death of Princess DianaThe Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domainsJournal of Research in Personality, 2003
- Case Closed? On the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Biased Assimilation of Evidence and Attitude PolarizationBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1995