Managing Conflicts of Interest in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guidelines Programme: Qualitative Study
Open Access
- 26 March 2015
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (3), e0122313
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122313
Abstract
There is international concern that conflicts of interest (COI) may bias clinical guideline development and render it untrustworthy. Guideline COI policies exist with the aim of reducing this bias but it is not known how such policies are interpreted and used by guideline producing organisations. This study sought to determine how conflicts of interest (COIs) are disclosed and managed by a national clinical guideline developer (NICE: the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). Qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 key informants: 8 senior staff of NICE’s guideline development centres and 6 chairs of guideline development groups (GDGs). We conducted a thematic analysis. Participants regard the NICE COI policy as comprehensive leading to transparent and independent guidance. The application of the NICE COI policy is, however, not straightforward and clarity could be improved. Disclosure of COI relies on self reporting and guideline developers have to take “on trust” the information they receive, certain types of COI (non-financial) are difficult to categorise and manage and disclosed COI can impact on the ability to recruit clinical experts to GDGs. Participants considered it both disruptive and stressful to exclude members from GDG meetings when required by the COI policy. Nonetheless the impact of this disruption can be minimised with good group chairing skills. We consider that the successful implementation of a COI policy in clinical guideline development requires clear policies and procedures, appropriate training of GDG chairs and an evaluation of how the policy is used in practice.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodologists and context experts disagreed regarding managing conflicts of interest of clinical practice guidelines panelsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- Conflict of Interest Policies for Organizations Producing a Large Number of Clinical Practice GuidelinesPLOS ONE, 2012
- Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice GuidelinesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2012
- Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2011
- Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional studyBMJ, 2011
- “Members of the Same Club”: Challenges and Decisions Faced by US IRBs in Identifying and Managing Conflicts of InterestPLOS ONE, 2011
- A Summary of the Methods That the National Clinical Guideline Centre Uses to Produce Clinical Guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical ExcellenceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- The Vexing Problem of Guidelines and Conflict of Interest: A Potential SolutionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?Applied Nursing Research, 2006
- Understanding Financial Conflicts of InterestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993