Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement
- 11 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 17 (5), 646-653
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02029.x
Abstract
To consider the validity and reliability of risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers are a major problem worldwide. They cause morbidity and lead to mortality. Risk assessment scales have been available for nearly 50 years, but there is insufficient evidence to state with any certainty that they are useful. A literature review and commentary. Bibliographic databases were searched for relevant papers, a critical review was completed on relevant papers. There is contradictory evidence concerning the validity of risk assesment scales. The interaction of education, clinical judgement and use of risk assessment scales has not been fully explored. It is not known which of these is most important, nor whether combining them results in better patient care. There is a need for further work. A study exploring the complex interaction of risk assessment scales, clinical judgement and education and training is introduced. Nurses may be wasting their time conducting risk assessment scoring if clinical judgement and/or education are sufficient to assess pressure ulcers risk.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inter-rater reliability and Waterlow’s pressure ulcer risk assessment toolNursing Standard, 2005
- Are patients with or at risk of pressure ulcers allocated appropriate prevention measures?International Journal of Nursing Practice, 2005
- Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scalesJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2005
- Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Intraoperative Pressure UlcersJournal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 2005
- Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication studyInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2004
- Presence of pressure ulcer prevention methods used among patients considered at risk versus those considered not at riskJournal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 1997
- The treatment of decubitus ulcers: a century of misinformation in the textbooksJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1996
- A NEW PRESSURE ULCER RISK ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY1American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1996
- British Medical JournalBMJ, 1873