Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context
- 1 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Economic Psychology
- Vol. 56, 126-140
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (SES-1227729, SES-1427414)
- Riksbankens Jubilemsfond
- Swedish Research Council
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requestsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012
- Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helpingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011
- “One of us”: Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriotOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victimsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006
- The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005
- The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005
- Trust, Accreditation, and Philanthropy in the NetherlandsNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2003
- Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow GivingThe Economic Journal, 1990
- Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of InvolvementJournal of Consumer Research, 1983