Production and carbon allocation in monocultures and mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium in Brazil
Open Access
- 14 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Tree Physiology
- Vol. 32 (6), 680-695
- https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps041
Abstract
Introducing nitrogen-fixing tree species in fast-growing eucalypt plantations has the potential to improve soil nitrogen availability compared with eucalypt monocultures. Whether or not the changes in soil nutrient status and stand structure will lead to mixtures that out-yield monocultures depends on the balance between positive interactions and the negative effects of interspecific competition, and on their effect on carbon (C) uptake and partitioning. We used a C budget approach to quantify growth, C uptake and C partitioning in monocultures of Eucalyptus grandis (W. Hill ex Maiden) and Acacia mangium (Willd.) (treatments E100 and A100, respectively), and in a mixture at the same stocking density with the two species at a proportion of 1 : 1 (treatment MS). Allometric relationships established over the whole rotation, and measurements of soil CO2 efflux and aboveground litterfall for ages 4–6 years after planting were used to estimate aboveground net primary production (ANPP), total belowground carbon flux (TBCF) and gross primary production (GPP). We tested the hypotheses that (i) species differences for wood production between E. grandis and A. mangium monocultures were partly explained by different C partitioning strategies, and (ii) the observed lower wood production in the mixture compared with eucalypt monoculture was mostly explained by a lower partitioning aboveground. At the end of the rotation, total aboveground biomass was lowest in A100 (10.5 kg DM m−2), intermediate in MS (12.2 kg DM m−2) and highest in E100 (13.9 kg DM m−2). The results did not support our first hypothesis of contrasting C partitioning strategies between E. grandis and A. mangium monocultures: the 21% lower growth (ΔBw) in A100 compared with E100 was almost entirely explained by a 23% lower GPP, with little or no species difference in ratios such as TBCF/GPP, ANPP/TBCF, ΔBw/ANPP and ΔBw/GPP. In contrast, the 28% lower ΔBw in MS than in E100 was explained both by a 15% lower GPP and by a 15% lower fraction of GPP allocated to wood growth, thus partially supporting our second hypothesis: mixing the two species led to shifts in C allocations from above- to belowground, and from growth to litter production, for both species.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Within-stand and seasonal variations of specific leaf area in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation in the Republic of CongoForest Ecology and Management, 2010
- Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii plantationForest Ecology and Management, 2010
- The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thoughtGlobal Environmental Change, 2009
- Stand level estimation of root respiration for two subtropical plantations based on in situ measurement of specific root respirationForest Ecology and Management, 2009
- Fine root production and turnover in Brazilian Eucalyptus plantations under contrasting nitrogen fertilization regimesForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Mixed-species plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil: 1. Growth dynamics and aboveground net primary productionForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Mixed-species plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil: 2: Nitrogen accumulation in the stands and biological N2 fixationForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Mechanical Stimuli Regulate the Allocation of Biomass in Trees: Demonstration with Young Prunus avium TreesAnnals of Botany, 2008
- Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its [CO 2 ]-induced enhancementProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Net primary production and nutrient cycling in replicated stands of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia facaltariaForest Ecology and Management, 1998