Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Vol. 39 (1), 99-128
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Abstract
The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Random Predictors on Comparisons of Coefficients Between Models: Comment on Clogg, Petkova, and HaritouAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1995
- Reply to Allison: More on Comparing Regression CoefficientsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1995
- Exact Variance of Indirect Effects in Recursive Linear ModelsSociological Methodology, 1995
- Statistical Methods for Analyzing Collapsibility in Regression ModelsJournal of Educational Statistics, 1992
- Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of VariabilitySociological Methodology, 1990
- The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Robustness?British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978
- Mathematical forms of the distribution of the product of two normal variablesCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1978
- The Decomposition of Effects in Path AnalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- The Probability Function of the Product of Two Normally Distributed VariablesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1947