Comparison of Serum and Red Blood Cell Folate Microbiologic Assays for National Population Surveys
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 141 (7), 1402-1409
- https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.141515
Abstract
Three laboratories participated with their laboratory-specific microbiologic growth assays (MA) in the NHANES 2007–2008 to assess whether the distributions of serum (n = 2645) and RBC folate (n = 2613) for the same one-third sample of participants were comparable among laboratories. Laboratory (L) 2 produced the highest and L1 the lowest serum and RBC folate geometric means (nmol/L) in the NHANES sample (serum: L1, 39.5; L2, 59.2; L3, 47.7; and RBC: L1, 1120; L2, 1380; L3, 1380). Each laboratory produced different reference intervals for the central 95% of the population. Pearson correlation coefficients were highest between L3 and L1 (serum, r = 0.95; RBC, r = 0.92) and lowest between L2 and L1 (serum, r = 0.81; RBC, r = 0.65). Notable procedural differences among the laboratories were the Lactobacillus rhamnosus microorganism (L1 and L3: chloramphenicol resistant, L2: wild type) and the calibrator [L1: [6S]5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-methylTHF), L2: [6R,S] 5-formyltetrahydrofolate ([6R,S] 5-formylTHF), L3: folic acid (FA)]. Compared with 5-methylTHF as calibrator, the folate results were 22–32% higher with FA as calibrator and 8% higher with 5-formylTHF as calibrator, regardless of the matrix (n = 30 serum, n = 28 RBC). The use of different calibrators explained most of the differences in results between L3 and L1 but not between L2 and L1. The use of the wild-type L. rhamnosus by L2 appeared to be the main reason for the differences in results between L2 and the other 2 laboratories. These findings indicate how assay variations influence MA folate results and how those variations can affect population data. To ensure data comparability, better assay harmonization is needed.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphism on Whole-Blood Folate Concentrations Measured by LC-MS/MS, Microbiologic Assay, and Bio-Rad RadioassayClinical Chemistry, 2008
- Comparison of Serum Folate Species Analyzed by LC-MS/MS with Total Folate Measured by Microbiologic Assay and Bio-Rad RadioassayClinical Chemistry, 2007
- Determination of Folate Vitamers in Human Serum by Stable-Isotope-Dilution Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with Radioassay and Microbiologic AssayClinical Chemistry, 2004
- The form of folate affects the mechanisms of methotrexate resistance in Enterococcus faeciumMicrobiology, 1997
- Microbiological assay on microtitre plates of folate in serum and red cells.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1992
- Folate assay: A comparison of radioassay and microbiological methodsClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1980
- A comparison of serum folate estimations using two different methods.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1973
- Experience with microbiological assay for folate using a chloramphenicol-resistant L. casei strainJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1972
- Automation of the assay of folate in serum and whole bloodJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1970
- An automated method for the measurement of folate activityJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1970