Which is more cost‐effective under the MELD system: primary liver transplantation, or salvage transplantation after hepatic resection or after loco‐regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria?
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in HPB
- Vol. 13 (11), 783-791
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00355.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to liver transplantationHPB, 2011
- Gene expression in nontumoral liver tissue and recurrence-free survival in hepatitis C virus-positive hepatocellular carcinomaMolecular Cancer, 2010
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Trends in the United States From 1975 to 2005Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of the MELD Allocation System and Predictors of SurvivalGastroenterology, 2008
- Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: A systematic review of 118 studiesJournal of Hepatology, 2006
- Resection and Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular CarcinomaSeminars in Liver Disease, 2005
- Liver Resection as a Bridge to Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on CirrhosisAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineJAMA, 1996
- Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Using Monte Carlo SimulationMedical Decision Making, 1985