Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal Of Medicine
- Vol. 112 (4), 290-297
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01111-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and womenAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Prognosis with abnormal thallium images in the absence of significant coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Noninvasive identification of severe coronary artery disease using exercise tomographic thallium-201 imagingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Sensitivity and specificity of tests: Can the “silent majority” speak?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Thallium-201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle branch blockThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- The Declining Specificity of Exercise Radionuclide VentriculographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: Results of standard and multi-pinhole tomographic techniquesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging in aortic valve stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977