Parents, Professionals, and Paranoia
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 6 (2), 151-167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017306066742
Abstract
Summary: In this paper, we appeal to professionals and others to take a more considered approach to the increasing panic relating to the touching of children of all ages. We attempt to disrupt the current trend by drawing attention to that which is currently being deferred in professional practice, yet which is evident in many formal and informal guidelines. We suggest that the contradictions we identify throughout the paper result more from a culture of fear than one of caring. We draw on our own small-scale earlier research experiences, and relevant and related literature in the area, but also note a scarcity of both in the UK context. We conclude that touching, at least in anglicized societies, has become an area that now requires fine judgements dependent on the interactive processes between all parties and that a broad-based analysis is clearly required. But we consider hesitation and ambiguity to be unavoidable in ethical decision making, something to be encouraged and not avoided by the search for blueprints, in our attempts to manage the perceived ‘risks’. Findings: Current practice is more dependent on fears of accusation and litigation than any concern for a child. Most child care workers ‘know’ this on the one hand, but nevertheless still attempt to justify their actions as sensible decision making. For example, a play group leader will claim he or she can’t put a plaster on a child because of a potential allergy: this is in spite of completed forms requesting information relating to allergies for each child, and allergies cease to be an issue anyway when a child is taken to the medical box and instructed from a distance on how to apply a plaster themselves. Contradictory accounts such as this are abundant in this area, and we suggest that many workers are behaving more like ‘victims’ than professionals. Applications: This paper is concerned with drawing attention to the need for all professionals working with children and young people of all ages to question their current and future decision making in relation to the wide range of touching practices that occur on a daily basis. Professionals should make their own mind up in relation to ethical matters, remembering that the ‘radicals’ of today become the ‘liberals’ of tomorrow.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- An unprotected species? On teachers as risky subjectsBritish Educational Research Journal, 2005
- ‘Touch’ in educational and child care settings: dilemmas and responsesBritish Educational Research Journal, 2003
- Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: teacher and nurse identities in fluxJournal of Education Policy, 2002
- Risk and Sociocultural TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- Preschoolers in America are Touched Less and are More Aggressive Than Preschoolers in FranceEarly Child Development and Care, 1999
- Children with asthma have improved pulmonary functions after massage therapyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1998
- Organized Bodies: Gender, Sexuality and Embodiment in Contemporary OrganizationsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1996
- Letter from Tokyo (4): Pioneering a Non-Western PsychologyScience News, 1978
- Comment: On Issues and Nonissues in the Study of PowerAmerican Political Science Review, 1971
- An Exploratory Study of Body‐Accessibility1British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1966