Diabetes Medications as Monotherapy or Metformin-Based Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 6 June 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 164 (11), 740-+
- https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2650
Abstract
Background: Clinicians and patients need updated evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of diabetes medications to make informed treatment choices. Purpose: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of monotherapy (thiazolidinediones, metformin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT-2] inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists) and selected metformin-based combinations in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data Sources: English-language studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, indexed from inception through March 2015 (MEDLINE search updated through December 2015). Study Selection: Paired reviewers independently identified 179 trials and 25 observational studies of head-to-head monotherapy or metformin-based combinations. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and serially extracted data and graded the strength of evidence. Data Synthesis: Cardiovascular mortality was lower for metformin versus sulfonylureas; the evidence on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and microvascular complications was insufficient or of low strength. Reductions in hemoglobin A1c values were similar across monotherapies and metformin-based combinations, except that DPP-4 inhibitors had smaller effects. Body weight was reduced or maintained with metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors and increased with sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin (between-group differences up to 5 kg). Hypoglycemia was more frequent with sulfonylureas. Gastrointestinal adverse events were highest with metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Genital mycotic infections were increased with SGLT-2 inhibitors. Limitation: Most studies were short, with limited ability to assess rare safety and long-term clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The evidence supports metformin as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes, given its relative safety and beneficial effects on hemoglobin A1c, weight, and cardiovascular mortality (compared with sulfonylureas). On the basis of less evidence, results for add-on therapies to metformin were similar to those for monotherapies.Funding Information
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (290-2012-00007-I)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trialsDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2013
- Dapagliflozin add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 102-week trialBMC Medicine, 2013
- Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered ApproachDiabetes Care, 2012
- Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitusCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case–control studyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- The risk of developing coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, and overall mortality, in type 2 diabetic patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or sulfonylureas: a retrospective analysisActa Diabetologica, 2009
- Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Liraglutide, Glimepiride, and Placebo, All in Combination With Metformin, in Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2009
- 10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2007Diabetes Care, 2008