Validation of the Cardiac Children's Hospital Early Warning Score: An Early Warning Scoring Tool to Prevent Cardiopulmonary Arrests in Children with Heart Disease
- 20 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Computers, Materials and Continua (Tech Science Press) in Congenital Heart Disease
- Vol. 9 (3), 194-202
- https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12132
Abstract
Most inpatient pediatric arrests are preventable by early recognition/treatment of deterioration. Children with cardiac disease have the highest arrest rates; however, early warning scoring systems have not been validated in this population. The objective of this study was to validate the Cardiac Children's Hospital Early Warning Score (C-CHEWS) tool in inpatient pediatric cardiac patients. The associated escalation of care algorithm directs: routine care (score 0-2), increased assessment/intervention (3-4), or cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) consult/transfer (≥5). Sensitivity and specificity were estimated based on retrospective review of patients that experienced unplanned CICU transfer/arrest (n = 64) and a comparison sample (n = 248) of admissions. The previously validated Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) tool was used for comparison. Patients' highest C-CHEWS scores were compared with calculated PEWS scores. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated for PEWS and C-CHEWS to measure discrimination. The AUROC curve for C-CHEWS was 0.917 compared with PEWS 0.785 (P < .001). The algorithm AUROC curve was 0.902 vs. PEWS of 0.782. C-CHEWS algorithm sensitivity was 96.9 (score ≥ 2), 79.7 (≥4), and 67.2 (≥5) vs. PEWS of 81.1(≥2), 37.5 (≥4), and 23.4 (≥5). C-CHEWS specificity was 58.1 (≥2), 85.5 (≥4), and 93.6 (≥5) vs. PEWS of 81.1 (≥2), 94.8 (≥4) and 97.6 (≥5). Lead time of elevated C-CHEWS scores (≥2) was a median of 9.25 hours prior to event vs. PEWS, which was 2.25 hours and lead time for critical C-CHEWS scores (≥5) was 2 hours vs. 0 hours for PEWS (P < .001). C-CHEWS has excellent discrimination to identify deterioration in children with cardiac disease and performed significantly better than PEWS both as an ordinal variable and when choosing cut points to maximize AUROC. C-CHEWS has a higher sensitivity than PEWS at all cut points.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children With Cardiac DiseaseCirculation, 2011
- Indicators of acute deterioration in adult patients nursed in acute wards: a factorial surveyJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2011
- Multicenter cohort study of in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Prospective Evaluation of a Pediatric Inpatient Early Warning Scoring SystemJournal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 2009
- Prospective cohort study to test the predictability of the Cardiff and Vale paediatric early warning systemArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- Survey of early identification systems to identify inpatient children at risk of physiological deteriorationArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2007
- The deterioration of children in ward areas in a specialist children’s hospitalNursing in Critical Care, 2007
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation algorithms, defibrillation and optimized ventilation during resuscitationCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2006
- Detecting and managing deterioration in childrenPaediatric Nursing, 2005
- Characteristics and outcome of cardiorespiratory arrest in childrenResuscitation, 2004