Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale
- 26 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 43 (4), 473-502
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9242-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Starting point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveysResource and Energy Economics, 2007
- A new valuation question: analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2007
- Incentive and informational properties of preference questionsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2007
- Conservative dichotomous choice responses in the active policy setting: DC rejections below WTPEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2007
- Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approachesResource and Energy Economics, 2007
- Induced-Value Tests of Contingent Valuation Elicitation MechanismsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2006
- A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2005
- Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owlEcological Economics, 1998
- Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to PayLand Economics, 1996
- Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparityJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1994