Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in Health Technology Assessment
- Vol. 18 (28), 1-+
- https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18280
Abstract
Health Technology Assessment Volume: 18, Issue: 28, Published in May 2014Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research
This publication has 252 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositisArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- Minimal clinically important differences of disease activity indices in childhood‐onset systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- What is an acceptable outcome of treatment before it begins? Methodological considerations and implications for patients with chronic low back painEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosisEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact QuestionnaireAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures IndexEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baselineArthritis Care & Research, 2009
- Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient‐reported outcomesCancer, 2007
- Measuring Patient and Clinician Perspectives to Evaluate Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validityEuropean Spine Journal, 2005