New study design evaluated the validity of measures to assess change after hip or knee arthroplasty
- 2 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 62 (3), 347-352
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patientsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement propertiesRheumatology, 2006
- Determinants of Self-Report Outcome Measures in People With Knee OsteoarthritisArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2006
- Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patientsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Does parallel item content on WOMAC's Pain and Function Subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status?BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2004
- Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplastyArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2002
- Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacementArthritis & Rheumatism, 2001
- Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplastyAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2001
- A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgeryOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2001
- The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1993