Ethics Issues Arising in the Transition to Learning Health Care Systems: Results from Interviews with Leaders from 25 Health Systems
Open Access
- 29 March 2016
- journal article
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes)
- Vol. 4 (2), 1212
- https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1212
Abstract
Introduction: There is increased interest in transitioning to a “learning health care system” (LHCS). While this transition brings the potential for significant benefits, it also presents several ethical considerations. Identifying the ethical issues faced by institutions in this transition is critical for realizing the goals of learning health care so that these issues can be anticipated and, where possible, resolved.Methods: 29 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with leaders within 25 health care institutions. Respondents were recruiting using purposive sampling, targeting institutions considered as LHCS leaders. All interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. NVIVO10 software was used to support qualitative analysis.Results: Respondents described seven ethical challenges: (1) ethical oversight of learning activities; (2) transparency of learning activities to patients; (3) potential tensions between improving quality and reducing costs; (4) data sharing and data management; (5) lag time between discovery and implementation; (6) transparency to patients about quality; and (7) randomization for quality improvement initiatives.Discussion: To move towards LHCS, several ethical considerations require further attention, including: the continued appropriateness of the research-treatment distinction; policy frameworks for privacy and data sharing; informing patients about learning activities; obligations to share data on quality; and the potential for trade-offs between quality improvement and cost control.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first project to ask leaders from health care systems committed to ongoing learning about the ethical issues they have faced in this effort. Their experiences can provide guidance on relevant ethical issues, and what might be done to resolve them.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effectiveness ResearchJAMA Pediatrics, 2014
- The Unbelievable Rightness of Being in Clinical TrialsHastings Center Report, 2013
- A policy framework for public health uses of electronic health dataPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2012
- When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research?Trials, 2011
- Can Research and Care Be Ethically Integrated?Hastings Center Report, 2011
- Cluster randomized trials to study the comparative effectiveness of therapeutics: stakeholders' concerns and recommendationsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- Harming through Protection?The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and TheoryHealth Services Research, 2007
- Determining When Quality Improvement Initiatives Should Be Considered ResearchJAMA, 2000