A Priori Conceptions, Methodological Dogmatism and Theory versus Practice: three reasons why CEO pay research lacks convergence
- 2 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Vol. 15 (4), 692-700
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00598.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Corporate Governance Reforms on the Remuneration of Executives in the UKCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2005
- Why Do Companies Use Performance-Related Pay for Their Executive Directors?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2004
- The Good, the Bad and the Lucky: CEO Pay and SkillSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- How Executive Directors’ Remuneration is Determined in Two FTSE 350 UtilitiesCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2003
- A Psychological Perspective on EconomicsAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Incentive Pay and the Market for CEOs: An Analysis of Pay-For-Performance SensitivitySSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Sources and Uses of Power in the BoardroomEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1998
- The Contribution, Power and Influence of Part‐time Board MembersCorporate Governance: An International Review, 1996
- Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and SymbolismAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1995
- Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. TheoryThe Journal of Finance, 1988