A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in Health Technology Assessment
- Vol. 9 (12), 1-+
- https://doi.org/10.3310/hta9120
Abstract
Health Technology Assessment Volume: 9, Issue: 12, Published in March 2005Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Technology Assessment Programme (02/31/01)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corticosteroids for acute traumatic brain injuryEmergencias, 2005
- Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical surveyBMJ, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Using multiple cutpoints for the free‐to‐total prostate specific antigen ratio improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection*The Prostate, 2002
- Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic testsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test dataStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Standard Scales for Measurement of Functional Outcome for Cervical Pain or DysfunctionSpine, 2002
- Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Follow-up after Abnormal Cervical Cancer ScreeningPreventive Medicine, 2000