The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 26 (1), 85-97
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.797
Abstract
Although neurological evidence is used with increasing frequency in criminal trials, there is limited research examining the effects that this evidence has on juror decision‐making in insanity trials. Participants (396) were presented with a case summary and psychological testimony and asked to render either a verdict of guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity in a 2 (psychosis or psychopathy) × (presence or absence of an MRI indicating a brain lesion) × (presence or absence of testimony describing a car accident that caused injury to the brain) factorial design. Defendants diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, defendants who could demonstrate the existence of a brain lesion via MRI, and defendants who had a history of brain injury were more likely to be found not guilty by reason of insanity than those defendants who did not present any neurological testimony. Participants who reported they were more influenced by the psychological and neurological testimony were almost six times more likely to render a verdict of NGRI than those participants who reported that the psychological and neurological testimony and evidence did not influence their decision regarding verdict. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre‐trial evaluationsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2003
- Acquired Personality Disturbances Associated With Bilateral Damage to the Ventromedial Prefrontal RegionDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 2000
- Long-Term Sequelae of Prefrontal Cortex Damage Acquired in Early ChildhoodDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 2000
- Psychiatric Neuroimaging Evidence: A High-Tech Crystal Ball?Stanford Law Review, 1997
- The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial.Law and Human Behavior, 1993
- Verdict selection processes in insanity cases: Juror construals and the effects of guilty but mentally ill instructions.Law and Human Behavior, 1993
- How jurors construe "insanity."Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Mock Juror Judgment and the Insanity Plea: Effects of Incrimination and Sanity information1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981