The estimation of body height from ulna length in healthy adults from different ethnic groups
- 14 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Vol. 25 (2), 121-128
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2011.01217.x
Abstract
How to cite this article Madden A.M., Tsikoura T. & Stott D.J. (2012) The estimation of body height from ulna length in healthy adults from different ethnic groups. J Hum Nutr Diet.25, 121–128 Abstract Background: Assessments of nutritional status frequently incorporate a measure of height to evaluate a person’s relative thinness or fatness. Because height is often difficult to quantify, it may be predicted from alternative anthropometric measurements, including ulna length. Little information is available about the accuracy of these predictions in an ethnically diverse population. The present study aimed to evaluate published equations for predicting height from ulna length in adults from different ethnic groups. Methods: Ulna length and standing height were measured in a gender‐stratified sample of 60 Asian, 69 Black and 65 White healthy volunteers, aged 21–65 years. Height was predicted from ulna length using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) equations and compared against the measured values. Linear regression analysis was used to develop equations to estimate height from ulna length and to explore the relationship between height and ulna length in subgroups. Results: The mean (SD) age for Asian, Black and White in men was 31.7 (11.0), 32.0 (10.3) and 38.6 (12.5) years and in women was 26.2 (5.4), 32.6 (8.9) and 35.7 (11.7); the mean (SD) height in men was 170.9 (5.2), 178.1 (7.3) and 176.3 (7.7) cm and in women was 157.7 (4.7), 164.0 (5.9) and 163.7 (6.2) cm. Ulna length and measured height were significantly correlated among all subgroups, except Asian women (r = 0.11, P = 0.57). The mean (SD) difference between predicted and measured height showed significant overestimates for Asian and Black men [4.0 (4.8) and 6.7 (5.3) cm] and Asian and Black women [6.4 (4.9) and 4.4 (4.9) cm] but not for White men and women. Conclusions: The MUST equations for predicting height from ulna length in healthy adults should be used with some caution among ethnically diverse populations, particularly in Asian women.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of Stature-predicted Equations using Knee Height for Elderly and Mobility Impaired Persons in KoreansEpidemiology and Health, 2009
- A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic reviewObesity Reviews, 2007
- Height prediction from ulna lengthDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2004
- Short ReportRelationship between arm span and stature in Malawian adultsAnnals of Human Biology, 2003
- Are the measures used to calculate BMI accurate and valid for the use in older people?Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2003
- Effect of recalled weight and height on malnutrition riskClinical Nutrition, 2003
- The use of armspan measurement to assess the nutritional status of adults in four Ethiopian ethnic groupsEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2002
- Is Arm Span an Accurate Measure of Height in Young and Middle-Age Adults?Clinical Nursing Research, 2000
- Weight, Height and Body Mass Index Distributions in Geographically and Ethnically Diverse Samples of Older PersonsAge and Ageing, 1996
- Arm-span, height, and age in Black and White womenAnnals of Human Biology, 1990