Watchful Waiting for Solid Renal Masses: Insight Into the Natural History and Results of Delayed Intervention
- 28 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 177 (2), 466-470
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.064
Abstract
Purpose: We describe the short-term outcomes of patients whose renal masses were managed expectantly (ie watchful waiting) to provide insight into the natural history of small renal tumors. Additionally, this study examined the effects of delayed intervention in patients who required intervention after a period of expectant management. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients with 46 renal masses underwent planned expectant management of enhancing solid or cystic (Bosniak IV) renal masses. A subset of these patients (13) who underwent eventual intervention was also examined. Outcomes with regard to age, gender, growth rate, subsequent interventions and clinical followup are reported. Results: At a mean followup of 36 months 74% of patients had tumor growth with a mean (median) growth rate of 0.70 (0.35) cm per year. None of the patients had significant symptoms, disease progression or cancer specific death. There were 4 patients (10%) who died of other causes. The 13 patients undergoing eventual intervention were younger than those who did not undergo intervention (56 vs 72 years, respectively, p = 0.0006). Patients undergoing eventual intervention tended to have a higher tumor growth rate than those on continued observation (0.90 vs 0.61 cm per year, respectively, p = 0.1486). In patients undergoing eventual intervention 12 of 14 (87%) tumors were renal cell carcinoma. All were stage pT1, and 12 of 13 patients were alive after a mean followup of 41 months (1 patient died of other causes 30 months after surgery). No patient had up-staging of disease secondary to delay. Conclusions: Watchful waiting for renal masses is a reasonable option for appropriately selected patients, especially those with competing comorbidities. Delayed intervention does not appear to adversely impact pathological outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Natural History of Observed Enhancing Renal Masses: Meta-Analysis and Review of the World LiteratureJournal of Urology, 2006
- NATURAL HISTORY OF SMALL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: EVALUATION OF GROWTH RATE, HISTOLOGICAL GRADE, CELL PROLIFERATION AND APOPTOSISJournal of Urology, 2004
- Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapyUrology, 2004
- The natural history of incidentally detected small renal massesCancer, 2004
- Natural History of Renal Masses Followed ExpectantlyJournal of Urology, 2004
- Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor SizeJournal of Urology, 2003
- Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinomaInternational Journal of Urology, 2001
- THE NATURAL HISTORY OF SMALL RENAL MASSESJournal of Urology, 2000
- Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth.Radiology, 1995
- Time trends in the incidence of renal carcinoma: Analysis of connecticut tumor registry data, 1935‐1989International Journal of Cancer, 1994