Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis—Consensus Guideline versus Expert Opinion
Open Access
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 21 (7), 1183-1188
- https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2107.130955
Abstract
Literature-based consensus guideline is more sensitive and easier to use in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chronic Q fever: Expert opinion versus literature analysis and consensusJournal of Infection, 2012
- Chronic Q fever: Review of the literature and a proposal of new diagnostic criteriaJournal of Infection, 2012
- Microbiological Challenges in the Diagnosis of Chronic Q FeverClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2012
- Vascular Complications of Q-fever InfectionsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2011
- Long-term outcome of Q fever endocarditis: a 26-year personal surveyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Coxiella burnetii infection of aortic aneurysms or vascular grafts: report of 30 new cases and evaluation of outcomeEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2007
- From Acute Q Fever to Endocarditis: Serological Follow-Up StrategyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Molecular Detection of Coxiella burnetii in the Sera of Patients with Q Fever Endocarditis or Vascular InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Proposed Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective EndocarditisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Treatment of Q Fever EndocarditisArchives of Internal Medicine, 1999