Wnt Antagonist Family Genes as Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Staging, and Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Tumor and Serum DNA
Open Access
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 12 (23), 6989-6997
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1194
Abstract
Purpose: We hypothesized that combined methylation analysis of Wnt antagonist genes could serve as a panel of biomarkers for diagnosis, staging, and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Experimental Design: Samples (n = 62) of RCC and corresponding normal renal tissue (NRT) were analyzed using methylation-specific PCR for methylation of six Wnt antagonist genes (sFRP-1, sFRP-2, sFRP-4, sFRP-5, Wif-1, and Dkk-3). To increase the sensitivity/specificity of RCC detection, the methylation score (M score) for multigene methylation analysis was developed. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal sensitivity/specificity of the M score. In addition, the M score was compared with the clinicopathologic outcome. Thirty-three serum DNA samples were also used to investigate the methylation status of Wnt antagonist genes. Results: The methylation levels of all Wnt antagonists were significantly higher in RCC than in NRT. In multivariate regression analysis, the methylation level of sFRP-1 was a significant independent predictor of RCC, whereas for sFRP-2 and sFRP-4 there was a trend toward significance as independent predictors. The M score of Wnt antagonist genes was significantly higher in RCC than in NRT. Overall, the M score had a sensitivity of 79.0% and a specificity of 75.8% (area under the curve, 0.808) as a diagnostic biomarker. In addition, the M score could significantly distinguish grade, pT category, M category, and overall survival of RCC patients. The M score was independent of age and gender in predicting overall survival by the Cox proportional hazards model. In RCC patients, 72.7% of the methylation-specific PCR results had identical methylation in samples of tumor and serum DNA. No serum DNA in normal controls showed aberrant methylation of the Wnt antagonist genes. In addition, the methylation status of Wnt antagonist genes in serum DNA was significantly correlated with tumor grade and stage. Conclusions: This is the first report showing that M score analysis of Wnt antagonist genes can serve as an excellent epigenetic biomarker panel for detection, staging, and prognosis of RCC using serum DNA.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aberrant methylation of secreted frizzled‐related protein genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagusInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Functional Loss of the γ-Catenin Gene through Epigenetic and Genetic Pathways in Human Prostate CancerCancer Research, 2005
- Biochemical and molecular markers in renal cell carcinoma: an update and future prospectsBiomarkers, 2005
- Dickkopf-3/REIC functions as a suppressor gene of tumor growthOncogene, 2004
- CpG Hypermethylation of MDR1 Gene Contributes to the Pathogenesis and Progression of Human Prostate CancerCancer Research, 2004
- Quantitative Detection of Promoter Hypermethylation of Multiple Genes in the Tumor, Urine, and Serum DNA of Patients with Renal CancerCancer Research, 2004
- Expression of the secreted frizzled-related protein gene family is downregulated in human mesotheliomaOncogene, 2004
- The power and the promise of DNA methylation markersNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Disease Outcome in Patients With Low Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nephron Sparing or Radical SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1996
- Incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: Role of ultrasonographyJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1992