Development of a Regional Climate Model for U.S. Midwest Applications. Part I: Sensitivity to Buffer Zone Treatment
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 14 (23), 4363-4378
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<4363:doarcm>2.0.co;2
Abstract
A regional climate model (RCM) is being developed for U.S. Midwest applications on the basis of the newly released Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Fifth-Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5), version 3.3. This study determines the optimal RCM domain and effective data assimilation technique to accurately integrate lateral boundary conditions (LBCs) across the buffer zones. The LBCs are constructed from both the NCEP–NCAR and ECMWF reanalyses to depict forcing uncertainties. The RCM domain was chosen to correctly represent the governing physical processes while minimizing LBC errors. Sensitivity experiments are conducted for the Midwest 1993 summer flood to investigate buffer zone treatment impacts on RCM performance. The results demonstrate the superiority of the buffer zone treatment that consists of the physically based domain choice and revised assimilation technique. Given this treatment, the RCM realistically simulates both temporal variations and spatial distributions in the major flood area (MFA). This success is identified with the accurate representation of both the midlatitude upper-level jet stream and Great Plains low-level jet (LLJ). The RCM reproduces different climate regimes, where observed rainfall was identified with the periodic (5 day) passage of midlatitude cyclones in June and persistent synoptic circulations in July. The model also correctly simulates the MFA rainfall diurnal cycle (with the peak amount at 0900 UTC), which follows the LLJ cycle by approximately 3 h. On the other hand, RCM performance is substantially reduced when the southern buffer zone extends to the Tropics, where large forcing errors exist. In particular, the RCM generates a weaker LLJ and, as a consequence, a decreased amount and delayed diurnal cycle of the MFA rainfall. In addition, the MM5 default LBC data assimilation technique produces considerable model biases, whereas the revised technique improves overall RCM performance and reduces sensitivity to domain size.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and SensitivityMonthly Weather Review, 2001
- Numerical Simulation of the 1993 Midwestern Flood: Land–Atmosphere InteractionsJournal of Climate, 1999
- The Great Plains Low-Level Jet during the Warm Season of 1993Monthly Weather Review, 1997
- The Anomalous Rainfall over the United States during July 1993: Sensitivity to Land Surface Parameterization and Soil Moisture AnomaliesMonthly Weather Review, 1996
- Atmospheric Circulation Associated with the Midwest Floods of 1993Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1995
- Some results from an intercomparison of the climates simulated by 14 atmospheric general circulation modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1992
- Comparison of the Impact of the 1982/83 and 1986/87 Pacific SST Anomalies on Time-Mean Predictions of Atmospheric CirculationJournal of Climate, 1991
- Warm Season Nocturnal Precipitation in the Great Plains of the United StatesJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 1985
- Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: an examination of the techniqueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1977
- DIURNAL VARIATIONS IN BOUNDARY LAYER WINDS OVER THE SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES IN SUMMERMonthly Weather Review, 1970