Point-of-Care Hemostatic Testing in Cardiac Surgery
Top Cited Papers
- 18 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation
- Vol. 134 (16), 1152-1162
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.023956
Abstract
Background: Cardiac surgery is frequently complicated by coagulopathic bleeding that is difficult to optimally manage using standard hemostatic testing. We hypothesized that point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm would improve the management of coagulopathy in cardiac surgery and thereby reduce blood transfusions. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial of a point-of-care–based transfusion algorithm in consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at 12 hospitals from October 6, 2014, to May 1, 2015. Following a 1-month data collection at all participating hospitals, a transfusion algorithm incorporating point-of-care hemostatic testing was sequentially implemented at 2 hospitals at a time in 1-month intervals, with the implementation order randomly assigned. No other aspects of care were modified. The primary outcome was red blood cell transfusion from surgery to postoperative day 7. Other outcomes included transfusion of other blood products, major bleeding, and major complications. The analysis adjusted for secular time trends, within-hospital clustering, and patient-level risk factors. All outcomes and analyses were prespecified before study initiation. Results: Among the 7402 patients studied, 3555 underwent surgery during the control phase and 3847 during the intervention phase. Overall, 3329 (45.0%) received red blood cells, 1863 (25.2%) received platelets, 1645 (22.2%) received plasma, and 394 (5.3%) received cryoprecipitate. Major bleeding occurred in 1773 (24.1%) patients, and major complications occurred in 740 (10.2%) patients. The trial intervention reduced rates of red blood cell transfusion (adjusted relative risk, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–0.98; P=0.02; number needed to treat, 24.7), platelet transfusion (relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.87; PP=0.004; number needed to treat, 22.6), but had no effect on other blood product transfusions or major complications. Conclusions: Implementation of point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm reduces red blood cell transfusions, platelet transfusions, and major bleeding following cardiac surgery. Our findings support the broader adoption of point-of-care hemostatic testing into clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02200419.This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult PopulationCirculation, 2016
- Outcome measures and quality markers for perioperative blood loss and transfusion in cardiac surgeryCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2015
- TEG and ROTEM: Technology and clinical applicationsAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2014
- Management of severe perioperative bleedingEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2013
- Alternatives to blood transfusionThe Lancet, 2013
- 2011 Update to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Blood Conservation Clinical Practice GuidelinesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Transfusion Requirements After Cardiac SurgeryJAMA, 2010
- A review of transfusion risks and optimal management of perioperative bleeding with cardiac surgeryTransfusion, 2008
- Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having Cardiac SurgeryCirculation, 2007
- The independent association of massive blood loss with mortality in cardiac surgeryTransfusion, 2004