The Vanishing Nonforensic Autopsy
- 28 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (9), 873-875
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp0707996
Abstract
We've all heard about cases in which a patient presumed to have died from acute myocardial infarction was discovered at autopsy to have had an aortic dissection, or a patient who presented with decompensated liver failure from presumed alcoholic cirrhosis but proved at autopsy to have widely metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Indeed, an extensive literature documents the frequency with which autopsy reveals clinically significant diagnoses that were missed before death.1 Autopsies also generate more accurate vital statistics, provide pathological descriptions of new diseases, and offer powerful tools for education and quality assurance (see Benefits of Nonforensic Autopsies). Yet despite these benefits, . . .This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The autopsy as a performance measure and teaching toolHuman Pathology, 2007
- Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy ratesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Changes in Rates of Autopsy-Detected Diagnostic Errors Over TimeJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2003
- The Value of the Autopsy in Three Medical ErasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983