Decision-Making Processes for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screening: The DECISIONS Survey
Open Access
- 29 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 30 (5_uppl), 53-64
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x10378701
Abstract
Background Patients should understand the risks and benefits of cancer screening in order to make informed screening decisions. Objectives To evaluate the extent of informed decision making in patient-provider discussions for colorectal (CRC), breast (BrCa), and prostate (PCa) cancer screening. Setting National sample of US adults identified by random-digit dialing. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between November 2006 and May 2007. Participants English-speaking US adults aged 50 y and older who had discussed cancer screening with a health care provider within the previous 2 y. Measurements Cancer screening survey modules that asked about demographic characteristics, cancer knowledge, the importance of various sources of information, and self-reported cancer screening decision-making processes. Results Overall, 1082 participants completed 1 or more of the 3 cancer modules. Although participants generally considered themselves well informed about screening tests, half or more could not correctly answer even 1 open-ended knowledge question for any given module. Participants consistently overestimated risks for being diagnosed with and dying from each cancer and overestimated the positive predictive values of prostate-specific antigen tests and mammography. Providers were the most highly rated information source, usually initiated screening discussions (64%–84%), and often recommended screening (73%–90%). However, participants reported that providers elicited their screening preferences in only 31% (CRC women) to 57% (PCa) of discussions. Although more than 90% of the discussions addressed the pros of screening, only 19% (BrCa) to 30% (PCa) addressed the cons of screening. Limitations Recall bias is possible because screening process reports were not independently validated. Conclusions Cancer screening decisions reported by patients who discussed screening with their health care providers consistently failed to meet criteria for being informed. Given the high ratings for provider information and frequent recommendations for screening, providers have important opportunities to ensure that informed decision making occurs for cancer screening decisions.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical DecisionsMedical Decision Making, 2010
- Informed Decision-Making and Colorectal Cancer ScreeningMedical Care, 2008
- The PSA testing dilemma: GPs' reports of consultations with asymptomatic men: a qualitative studyBMC Family Practice, 2007
- Are Physicians Discussing Prostate Cancer Screening with Their Patients and Why or Why Not? A Pilot StudyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Patient–Physician Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions and Screening UseAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Attitudes and Practices: Preferences for Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- A population‐based study of colorectal cancer test useCancer, 2004
- Women’s Preferences for Doctor’s Involvement in Decisions about Mammography ScreeningMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammographyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- Physician–patient discussions of controversial cancer screening testsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001