To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations.
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Applied Psychology
- Vol. 88 (3), 444-458
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.444
Abstract
The authors used R. Folger and R. Cropanzano's (1998, 2001) fairness theory to derive predictions about the effects of explanation provision and explanation adequacy on justice judgments and cooperation, retaliation, and withdrawal responses. The authors also used the theory to identify potential moderators of those effects, including the type of explanation (justification vs. excuse), outcome favorability, and study context. The authors' predictions were tested by using meta-analyses of 54 independent samples. The results showed strong effects of explanations on both the justice and response variables. Moreover, explanations were more beneficial when they took the form of excuses rather than justifications, when they were given after unfavorable outcomes, and when they were given in contexts with instrumental, relational, and moral implications.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker PerceptionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000
- Managerial: Accounts and Fairness Perception in Conflict Resolution: Differentiating the Effects of Minimizing Responsibility and Providing JustificationBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1998
- Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Fairness and Implied Contract Obligations in Job Terminations: The Role of Remedies, Social Accounts, and the Procedural JusticeHuman Performance, 1993
- Justice and organizational punishment: Attitudinal outcomes of disciplinary eventsSocial Justice Research, 1993
- Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment InequityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- Using explanations to manage impressions of performance appraisal fairnessEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1991
- Managerial responsibilities and procedural justiceEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1989
- Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accountsSocial Justice Research, 1987
- Verbal accounts and attributions of social motivesJournal of Research in Personality, 1983