Long‐Term Effects of Head Start on Low‐Income Children
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 1136 (1), 257-268
- https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1425.005
Abstract
A growing body of research suggests that the first few years of life are a particularly promising time to intervene in the lives of low-income children, although the long-term effects on children of the U.S. government's primary early childhood program--Head Start--remains the topic of debate. In this article we review what is known about Head Start and argue that the program is likely to generate benefits to participants and society as a whole that are large enough to justify the program's costs. Although in principle there could be more beneficial ways of deploying Head Start resources, the benefits of such changes remain uncertain and there is some downside risk.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Getting inside the “Black Box” of Head Start quality: What matters and what doesn’tEconomics of Education Review, 2007
- Does Head Start Improve Children's Life Chances? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity DesignThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- How much of the decrease in cancer death rates in the United States is attributable to reductions in tobacco smoking?Tobacco Control, 2006
- Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Head Start Participation and Childhood ObesitySSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Assessment Issues in the Testing of Children at School EntryThe Future of Children, 2005
- The Effects of Universal Pre-K on Cognitive Development.Developmental Psychology, 2005
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- Early Childhood Education ProgramsJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2001
- Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation DesignsEvaluation Review, 1984