Effects of number and siting of single-space feeders on performance and feeding behaviour of growing pigs
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- animals
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 122 (3), 465-470
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185960006740x
Abstract
SUMMARY: Two experiments of randomized block design were carried out at the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland in 1991/92 involving groups of 20 pigs fed ad libitum from single-space feeders with built-in water supply from 37 kg to slaughter at 91 kg liveweight.Treatments were replicated 16 and 6 times respectively in Experiments 1 and 2. In the first experiment, one feeder perpen was compared with two feeders per pen positioned side by side. Two feeders increased feed intake (P < 0·05) but had no significant effects on growth rate or feed conversion. With two feeders, the total time that feeders were occupied and the number of visits to feeders were both increased, while the number of enforced withdrawals from feeders and the amount of queuing were both decreased compared with the single feeder. In the second experiment, placing two feeders 2 m or more apart instead of side by side had no significant effects on feed intake or growth rate but improved feed conversion efficiency by 4%. This improvement was associated with fewer and longer visits to feeders but no difference in enforced withdrawals or queuing. In both experiments all treatments showed broadly similar patterns of diurnal feeding behaviour with two peaks of activity daily, a smaller peak pre-midday and a larger one in the afternoon. This pattern was influenced more by number of visits to feeders than by the mean duration of each visit. It is recommended that two single-space feeders are used in pens of 20 finishing pigs when non-pelleted diets are offered ad libitum and that feeders are sited some distance apart, not side by side.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energy cost of standing activity in sowsLivestock Production Science, 1993
- Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigsAnimal Science, 1992
- The effects on performance and behaviour of number of growing pigs per mono-place feederAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 1991
- A note on hunger in the pig: sows on restricted rations will sustain an energy deficit to gain additional foodAnimal Science, 1991
- Automatic recording of individual voluntary feed intake in group housed pigsProceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972), 1990
- A review of the factors influencing the aggressive and agonistic behaviour of the domestic pigAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1987
- Behavior and Performance of Weanling Pigs in Pens Equipped with Hide AreasJournal of Animal Science, 1985
- Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological ‘needs’Animal Behaviour, 1983
- Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed “AD libitum” from one or several self-feedersApplied Animal Ethology, 1982
- Dominance and eating behavior of beef cattle fed from a single stallApplied Animal Ethology, 1981