Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Spine Surgery and the Influence of Spinal Fusion Procedures
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 32 (3), 382-387
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46
Abstract
Retrospective cohort study using a hospital discharge registry of all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Washington state. To determine the cumulative incidence of reoperation following lumbar surgery for degenerative disease and, for specific diagnoses, to compare the frequency of reoperation following fusion with that following decompression alone. Repeat lumbar spine operations are generally undesirable, implying persistent symptoms, progression of degenerative changes, or treatment complications. Compared to decompression alone, spine fusion is commonly viewed as a stabilizing treatment that may reduce the need for additional surgery. However, indications for fusion surgery in degenerative spine disorders remain controversial, and the effects of fusion on reoperation rates are unclear. Adults who underwent inpatient lumbar surgery for degenerative spine disorders in 1990–1993 (n = 24,882) were identified from International Classification of Diseases ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and then categorized as having either a lumbar decompression surgery or lumbar fusion surgery. We then compared the subsequent incidence of lumbar spine surgery between these groups. Patients who had surgery in 1990–93 had a 19% cumulative incidence of reoperation during the subsequent 11 years. Patients with spondylolisthesis had a lower cumulative incidence of reoperation after fusion surgery than after decompression alone (17.1% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.002). For other diagnoses combined, the cumulative incidence of reoperation was higher following fusion than following decompression alone (21.5% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.008). After fusion surgery, 62.5% of reoperations were associated with a diagnosis suggesting device complication or pseudarthrosis. Patients should be informed that the likelihood of reoperation following a lumbar spine operation is substantial. For spondylolisthesis, reoperation is less likely following fusion than following decompression alone. For other degenerative spine conditions, the cumulative incidence of reoperation is higher or unimproved after a fusion procedure compared to decompression alone.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population-Based Trends in Volumes and Rates of Ambulatory Lumbar Spine SurgerySpine, 2006
- United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative ConditionsSpine, 2005
- Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trialBMJ, 2005
- Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back painThe Spine Journal, 2005
- Spinal-Fusion Surgery — The Case for RestraintNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 YearsSpine, 2004
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc DegenerationSpine, 2003
- 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back PainSpine, 2001
- Shared Decision-Making and the Orthopaedic WorkforcePublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2001
- Low Back Pain HospitalizationSpine, 1994