Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey
Open Access
- 30 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 18 (5), 1081-1092
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12081
Abstract
Background/objectives To determine which aspects of primary care matter most to patients, we aim to identify those aspects of patient experience that show the strongest relationship with overall satisfaction and examine the extent to which these relationships vary by socio‐demographic and health characteristics. Design/setting Data from the 2009/10 English General Practice Patient Survey including 2 169 718 respondents registered with 8362 primary care practices. Measures/analyses Linear mixed‐effects regression models (fixed effects adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, self‐reported health, self‐reported mental health condition and random practice effect) predicting overall satisfaction from six items covering four domains of care: access, helpfulness of receptionists, doctor communication and nurse communication. Additional models using interactions tested whether associations between patient experience and satisfaction varied by socio‐demographic group. Results Doctor communication showed the strongest relationship with overall satisfaction (standardized coefficient 0.48, 95% CI = 0.48, 0.48), followed by the helpfulness of reception staff (standardized coefficient 0.22, 95% CI = 0.22, 0.22). Among six measures of patient experience, obtaining appointments in advance showed the weakest relationship with overall satisfaction (standardized coefficient 0.06, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.06). Interactions showed statistically significant but small variation in the importance of drivers across different patient groups. Conclusions For all patient groups, communication with the doctor is the most important driver of overall satisfaction with primary care in England, along with the helpfulness of receptionists. In contrast, and despite being a policy priority for government, measures of access, including the ability to obtain appointments, were poorly related to overall satisfaction.Keywords
Funding Information
- UK Department of Health
- National Institute for Health Research
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multisource Feedback in Evaluating the Performance of DoctorsAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Do English patients want continuity of care, and do they receive it?British Journal of General Practice, 2012
- Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient SurveyBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient SurveyBMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- The discriminative power of patient experience surveysBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Understanding What Matters to Patients – Identifying Key Patients’ Perceptions of QualityJRSM Open, 2010
- Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in EnglandBMJ, 2009
- The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristicsBMC Family Practice, 2009
- What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients' PrioritiesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2008
- Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care — A Major Experiment in the United KingdomThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004