What can we learn about ship emission inventories from measurements of air pollutants over the Mediterranean Sea?
Open Access
- 18 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 9 (18), 6815-6831
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6815-2009
Abstract
Ship emission estimates diverge widely for all chemical compounds for several reasons: use of different methodologies (bottom-up or top-down), activity data and emission factors can easily result in a difference ranging from a factor of 1.5 to even an order of magnitude. Combining three sets of observational data – ozone and black carbon measurements sampled at three coastal sites and on board of a Mediterranean cruise ship, as well as satellite observations of atmospheric NO2 column concentration over the same area – we assess the accuracy of the three most commonly used ship emission inventories, EDGAR FT (Olivier et al., 2005), emissions described by Eyring et al. (2005) and emissions reported by EMEP (Vestreng et al., 2007). Our tool is a global atmospheric chemistry transport model which simulates the chemical state of the Mediterranean atmosphere applying different ship emission inventories. The simulated contributions of ships to air pollutant levels in the Mediterranean atmosphere are significant but strongly depend on the inventory applied. Close to the major shipping routes relative contributions vary from 10 to 50% for black carbon and from 2 to 12% for ozone in the surface layer, as well as from 5 to 20% for nitrogen dioxide atmospheric column burden. The relative contributions are still significant over the North African coast, but less so over the South European coast because densely populated regions with significant human activity contribute relatively more to air pollution than ships, even if these regions attract a lot of ship traffic. The observations poorly constrain the ship emission inventories in the Eastern Mediterranean where the influence of uncertain land based emissions, the model transport and wet deposition are at least as important as the signal from ships. In the Western Mediterranean, the regional EMEP emission inventory gives the best match with most measurements, followed by Eyring for NO2 and ozone and by EDGAR for black carbon. Given the uncertainty of the measurements and the model, each of the three emission inventories could actually be right, implying that large uncertainties in ship emissions need to be considered for future scenario analysis.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using SEVIRI geostationary imagery for active fires analysis and burned biomass estimation: A case study in a Mediterranean ecosystemForest Ecology and Management, 2006
- Ozone pollution from future ship traffic in the Arctic northern passagesGeophysical Research Letters, 2006
- Satellite measurements of NO2 from international shipping emissionsGeophysical Research Letters, 2004
- Toward regional‐scale modeling using the two‐way nested global model TM5: Characterization of transport using SF6Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004
- Estimate of nitrogen oxide emissions from shipping by satellite remote sensingGeophysical Research Letters, 2004
- Canadian Aerosol Module: A size‐segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models 1. Module developmentJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2003
- The annual volcanic gas input into the atmosphere, in particular into the stratosphere: a global data set for the past 100 yearsJournal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2002
- What controls tropospheric ozone?Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000
- A global high‐resolution emission inventory for ammoniaGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1997
- A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissionsJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1995